Home / Cases / Fair Trading 98/07/2004



Left menu

Notification

News Highlights

EC PSI Consultation – report published

The EC has published the outcome of the PSI Directive consultation

PSI Pricing Questionnaire

Have Your Say about PSI Re-use Conditions and Charging

Latest news

Malta reports

The report on the Maltese national PSI meeting – published

European PSI platform

EC publishes contract award for the European public sector information (PSI) platform

Register of EU lobbyists

EC Register for Interest Representatives now exceeds 700 registered lobbyists

Exclusive Arrangements prohibited!

Article 11 of PSI Direct re Exclusive arrangements now enforceable!

Czech Presidency of EU

France hands over to the Czech Republic the European Presidency

Newsletter

.

ePSIplus Update No. 8

In this December 2008 issue, read about perspectives on the EC PSI Directive Review Consultation Report, findings of EC commissioned research on licensing and pricing models, a new German PSI Industry Association, the ePSIplus Pricing Survey underway and ePSIplus Polish National and Financial Impact Meetings.

.

Right menu

Advanced Search

Meetings

ePSIplus Announces Cross Border Meeting - Visegrad Countries

Re-use of Public Information (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovak Republic), 11 February 2009 (Beckov, Slovak Republic)

UK - Decision of the Office of Fair Trading No. CA 98/07/2004

TM Property Services Limited's complaint against MacDonald Dettwiler (Hub) Limited and MacDonald Dettwiler (Channel) Ltd (trading as Transaction Online) 18 August 2004 (Case CE-2941/03).

SUMMARY The OFT has concluded that MacDonald Dettwiler (Hub) Limited (MDHL) and MacDonald Dettwiler (Channel) Limited (trading as Transaction Online) (TOL), both wholly owned subsidiaries of MacDonald Dettwiler Ltd, have not infringed the prohibition imposed by section 18 of the Competition Act 1998 (the Act).

The OFT's investigation was initiated by a complaint made by TM Property Services Limited (TM), which alleged that MDHL and TOL were abusing a dominant position in the market for property searches by: adopting a pricing policy which results in a margin squeeze; pricing at predatory levels; and charging excessive prices. The relevant product market in this case is the market for the delivery of LLC1 and Con29 property searches.

The OFT has concluded that MDHL and TOL do not hold a dominant position in this market. The OFT has therefore decided that MDHL and TOL have not infringed the prohibition imposed by section 18 of the Act.

For more information, download the summary file.